ARROWS OF FIRE FIRES THAT WERE PROTECTED LIABILITY AS PROPERTY THAT DAMAGES CAUSING A FIRE WITHOUT LIGHTING IT LIABILITY THROUGH OWNERSHIP
Week 3 Focus:
אש
ARROWS OF FIRE
FIRES THAT WERE PROTECTED
LIABILITY AS PROPERTY THAT DAMAGES
CAUSING A FIRE WITHOUT LIGHTING IT
LIABILITY THROUGH OWNERSHIP
Introduction
One of the four main categories of damagers is fire damage. Fire is unique in that it is an inanimate
force, which in some ways makes it comparable to the direct actions of the perpetrator. On the
other hand, the Torah exempts covered objects from fire damage, making fire damage less liable
than even the acts of one’s animal.
Points to Ponder
• If an uncommon wind swept a fire out of control and caused widespread damage, is the one who lit the fire liable in Bais Din? Is he liable in the Laws of Heaven?
• What is the practical difference between isho mishum chitov and isho mishim mamono?
• Does the Torah’s exemption for covered items also mean that there is no liability toward the Laws of Heaven?
• Are all flying objects that do damage classified as fire damage? Does the exemption of covered items
No comments:
Post a Comment