Answered By Rav Baruch Meir Levine Answer: Had he made a proper kinyan, he would be bound to the agreement and would owe the rent for the full two years if he does not find a replacement tenant. In this case, however, there was no contract, so there is no kinyan of shtar. While kesef normally is a kinyan for land, and one only needs to give a partial payment for the kinyan to go into effect, the security deposit would also not be a kinyan. This is because a security deposit is not really a rental payment. It actually is a security for the landlord that he can hold onto in case something in the apartment gets damaged or there is some other type of loss. From a legal perspective, the money should really be put into an escrow account that the owner does not have access to; so, it is obvious that it is not really a payment. Even if they agreed not to put the money into escrow, it is still only akin to a mashkon to be used for any balances, and not a payment.
Accordingly, it would not qualify as a kinyan and, therefore, if the tenant backs out, he would only lose the deposit and nothing more.
Question: What if Shimon gave the money not as a security deposit but as the first and last months' rent? Would that be a kinyan?
Answer: That would technically be a kinyan and he would be bound to the entire lease. Still, there are some Acharonim who say that if the rent was given early before it is actually due, it is not considered a payment, as it was only given to reserve the apartment, even though it will later be used as a payment. That might be a way to exempt him from being bound to the entire two-year lease. |
No comments:
Post a Comment