Our parasha deals with the service of the High Priest on Yom Kippur, and with the processes of atonement and purification of the Mishkan and of the people of Israel. We would expect that the opening verse of the parasha would present this central theme, but instead, it opens with a surprising verse that harks back to Parashat Shemini:
And the Lord spoke to Moshe, after the death of the two sons of Aharon when they drew near before the Lord and died. (Vayikra 16:1)
This opening creates a direct connection between the story of the death of Nadav and Avihu and the service of Yom Kippur. But what is that connection? Why is it important for the Torah to note that the service of Yom Kippur was taught in relation to this story?
The Eighth Day and Yom Kippur
One can easily see from this parasha that the service of Yom Kippur is not only a system of atonement, but a broader process that outlines the proper path by which to come close – against the backdrop of the failure of the approach Nadav and Avihu attempted on the eighth day of the inauguration of the Mishkan.
Indeed, a careful reading reveals that the Yom Kippur service is built to a large extent on foundations reminiscent of “the eighth day.” The purpose of the priestly service in both cases is to create appropriate conditions for the Shekhina to rest in the Mishkan – in Parashat Shemini, it is stated: "for today the Lord will appear to you" (9:3), and in our parasha: "for I appear in the cloud on the ark-cover" (16:2).
This parallel is also reflected in the structure of the service: in both cases, separate sacrifices are offered that distinguish between atonement for the priests and atonement for the people. Our parasha also relates directly to the Mishkan and its purification from the effects of sin:
And he shall make atonement for the Sanctuary from the impurities of the children of Israel, and from their transgressions, all their sins; and so shall he do for the Tent of Meeting, that dwells with them in the midst of their impurities. (16:16)
Thus, Yom Kippur is not only a day of personal atonement, but also a renewed moment of the resting of the Shekhina – a sort of return to the starting point of the dedication of the Mishkan.
But this sharpens the question with which we began: If indeed the Yom Kippur service returns to the starting point of the Mishkan – “the eighth day” – what is the place of the death of Nadav and Avihu within this framework?
The answer begins to emerge in the second verse of the parasha:
Speak to Aharon your brother, that he not come at all times into the Sanctuary, within the curtain, before the ark-cover that is upon the ark, that he not die… (16:2)
The emphasis on "that he not die" sets the Yom Kippur service in direct contrast to what happened to Nadav and Avihu: they drew near and died; the High Priest is commanded to draw near, but in a way that will not lead to death. Hence, the Yom Kippur service is not only a reenactment, but also a repair. It defines the proper way to approach the Sanctuary.
But questions remain. On the face of it, the actions of Nadav and Avihu are very similar to what the High Priest is commanded to do here! They too brought incense; they too sought to bring about the resting of the Shekhina. What exactly is the difference?
To understand this, one must consider the deep difference between two central concepts that accompany the two events: fire and cloud.
Modes of Divine Revelation
On the eighth day, the revelation of the Shekhina occurs through the appearance of fire: "And a fire went out from before the Lord and consumed upon the altar" (9:24). The sin of Nadav and Avihu is also connected to the bringing of fire: "And they offered a strange [or “foreign”] fire before the Lord which He had not commanded them" (10:1). Fire is the medium through which the revelation takes place, and it is also the medium through which Nadav and Avihu choose to act, and in which they find their death: "And a fire went out from before the Lord and consumed them, and they died" (10:2).
In contrast, the focus in our parasha is not fire but the revelation of the Shekhina in a cloud, as in the opening verse: "For in the cloud I appear upon the ark-cover" (16:2). Later on as well, we find that the main service of the High Priest in the Holy of Holies is to cover the place with a cloud: "And he shall put the incense upon the fire before the Lord, and the cloud of the incense will cover the ark-cover" (16:13); although there is also fire here, it becomes a means of creating a cloud.
In order to understand the difference between the eighth day and the service of the High Priest on Yom Kippur, we must delve into the distinction between these two types of revelation – in fire and in cloud.
Revelation in Fire
Fire symbolizes clarity, revelation, and a sharp and illuminating presence. It allows us to see, to distinguish, and to try to grasp. Experientially, fire produces certainty: there is light, visibility, something one can hold on to. In this sense, fire is appropriate for the dedication of the Mishkan – a unique moment at which a clear, one-time revelation is needed in order to confirm God’s acceptance of the service. The fire descending from heaven to the altar establishes the sacrificial service of the Mishkan.
However, alongside its ability to illuminate, fire also carries danger. The fire that came from before the Lord on the eighth day did not merely illuminate, but also “consumed upon the altar.” Whatever comes near fire is liable to burn. Fire creates a space in which one can see but cannot get too close. It allows a view, but limits an encounter.
In this sense, fire expresses a relationship in which man stands before the revelation – seeing it, being impressed by it, but not entering into it. It is a relationship of distance, though it has power. Moshe experienced another example of such an encounter at the burning bush:
And an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a flame of fire from the midst of the bush; and he looked, and behold, the bush was burning with fire… And He said: Do not come near; remove your shoes from upon your feet, for the place on which you stand is holy ground. (Shemot 3:2-4).
The story of the burning bush describes what happens between man and God when the revelation is in fire: the spectacle is wondrous, and it arouses a desire in man to approach God. But man is prevented from such an encounter: "Do not come near." Man shrinks away from the great, threatening, and consuming revelation.
Of course, the greatest and most impressive revelation of God in fire took place at Mount Sinai:
And Mount Sinai was all in smoke, because the Lord descended upon it in fire; and its smoke ascended like the smoke of a furnace, and the whole mountain quaked greatly. (Shemot 19:18)
At Sinai as well, the revelation in fire was intended to create a clear and powerful sight, to make a strong impression on the people and to create certainty about God’s connection with them:
And you said: Behold, the Lord our God has shown us His glory and His greatness, and we have heard His voice from the midst of the fire; we have seen this day that God does speak with man and he lives. (Devarim 5:20)
However, alongside the power of the fire, which enabled the people of Israel to see things and feel a sense of certainty, here too we witness the great danger in the fire of revelation:
And the Lord said to Moshe: Go down, charge the people, lest they break through to the Lord to gaze and many of them perish. And the priests also, who come near to the Lord, shall sanctify themselves, lest the Lord break forth upon them. (Shemot 19:21-22)
This danger created a substantial fear among the people during the course of the revelation:
And it came to pass on the third day, when it was morning, that there were thunders and lightnings and a thick cloud upon the mountain, and the sound of a horn exceeding strong; and all the people that were in the camp trembled. (Shemot 19:16)
Their fear caused the people to recoil and move backwards during the assembly (Shemot 20:15). Fire creates clarity, but it also prevents a close encounter with the Shekhina.
Revelation in the Cloud
Cloudiness expresses the opposite of fire in almost every respect. A cloud does not illuminate, but obscures; it does not sharpen, but blurs. In experiential terms, a cloud produces uncertainty: there is no clear vision, no full perception, and no possibility of "grasping" reality in a sharp manner.
But precisely for this reason, the cloud allows for a different kind of movement: not a distant gaze, but entry. One cannot enter fire without being burned, but one can enter a cloud, even if he does not see anything clearly. The cloud does not consume one who enters it, but rather envelops him. Therefore, when Moshe ascends Sinai, he enters the cloud, not the fire:
And Moshe went up to the mountain, and the cloud covered the mountain. And the glory of the Lord abode upon Mount Sinai, and the cloud covered it six days; and He called to Moshe on the seventh day from the midst of the cloud. And the appearance of the glory of the Lord was like a consuming fire at the top of the mountain in the eyes of the children of Israel. And Moshe came into the midst of the cloud and went up to the mountain. (Shemot 24:15-18)
The verses repeatedly emphasize that Moshe met with God by entering into the cloud; at the same time, God's revelation to the people below continued to take place through the "consumingfire," which deterred them from approaching. Even Moshe could not approach the revelation in fire, as at the burning bush – only the other, gentler mode of revelation, in the cloud, allowed the intimate encounter in which the Torah was given to Moshe. The external revelation was in fire, but the internal encounter took place in the cloud. Fire allows vision but creates recoil; a cloud is obscure but allows closeness.
Revelation in Fire Versus Revelation in Cloud
As stated, the revelation on the eighth day was through the descent of a fire that consumed the sacrifices in the sight of the people. With this, something happened that was similar to the revelation at Mount Sinai. The fire that appeared on the mountain appeared again in the Mishkan, and thus the great revelation that took place at Sinai continued into the Mishkan.[1] However, the same fire also led to a terrible disaster and consumed Nadav and Avihu:
And a fire went out from before the Lord, and it consumed upon the altar the burnt-offering and the fats; and all the people saw it, and they shouted and fell on their faces. And the sons of Aharon, Nadav and Avihu, took each one his censer… And a fire went out from before the Lord, and consumed them, and they died before the Lord. (Vayikra 9:24-10:2)
The service involving the “strange fire” of Nadav and Avihu seems to be connected to what they experienced as two of the select few who were exceptionally privileged, after the revelation at Mount Sinai, to see with their own eyes something tangible of the Divine:
Then Moshe went up, and Aharon, Nadav, and Avihu, and seventy of the elders of Israel; and they saw the God of Israel; and there was under His feet the like of a paved work of sapphire stone, and the like of the very heaven for clearness. (Shemot 24:9-10)
Perhaps this vision caused them to be drawn to further revelation of fire and to bring what was in fact a strange fire in order to rekindle the revelation,[2] but this yearning for fire and vision then caused them to be burned by the fire of God. Their approach was excessive.
The Yom Kippur service, which appears "after the death" of Nadav and Avihu, presents a repair: revelation in fire was sufficient on the eighth day to dedicate the Mishkan and create a tangible and definite revelation in it, but from now on, the intimate encounter between the people of Israel and their God will take place through the cloud. This is also why the High Priest does not attempt to recreate the fire of the eighth day on Yom Kippur, but rather the opposite – he produces a cloud. The incense is intended to create fog, not light:
And he shall put the incense upon the fire before the Lord, and the cloud of the incense shall cover the ark-cover that is upon the testimony, that he not die. (16:13)
The cloud becomes a necessary condition for the encounter, so there will not be further tragedy in the Mishkan. It turns out that the path to repair is not in avoiding approach altogether, but in changing the character of the approach: instead of an attempt to see, to understand, to illuminate, the High Priest must enter into a space where vision is limited. He operates within a cloud, within ambiguity, and thus intimacy becomes possible without danger.
The cloud creates a space in which man does not control revelation but is present in it. He does not grasp the Divine, but stands before it in humility. It is precisely through the renunciation of complete clarity that a door is opened to a deeper encounter.
The significance of these words is broader than just the Temple service. Man tends to seek clarity: to understand, to define, to see. He seeks light – a fire that will illuminate reality. However, the Torah sets a limit on this ability. There are areas in which clarity itself can become a problem, because it creates an illusion of control and complete understanding.
In contrast, there are situations in which it is precisely the presence of ambiguity that allows for a genuine encounter. When a person is willing to enter a space where not everything is clear, where there is a limit to understanding and vision, then a deeper experience of closeness is possible.
Fire illuminates, but creates distance; a cloud conceals, but allows entry. Nadav and Avihu sought to illuminate – and thereby distanced themselves to the point of danger. The Yom Kippur service teaches the opposite path: to accept the cloud, to enter into it, and from there, to encounter.
In this sense, the Yom Kippur service is not merely a historical repair for a specific sin, but a fundamental proposal for how man should approach holiness: not out of an attempt to see everything, but out of a willingness to enter into what is not fully visible. It is precisely through acceptance of the fog that an opening is created for an encounter.
(Translated by David Strauss; edited by Sarah Rudolph)
[1] See Ramban, Shemot 25:1: "The secret of the Mishkan is that the glory that rested on Mount Sinai would rest on it in a concealed manner."
[2] See also the shiur on Parashat Shemini in this series.
No comments:
Post a Comment