Rav Yitzchak Grossman
Answer: This question was first discussed by the Pnei Moshe in the 17th century. He cites a machlokes if daughters can be forced to sign documents to allow the sons to take possession of an estate. Those who argued that they can be forced make the case that the sons are entitled to the estate according to halacha and signing over their rights is like hashavas aveidah, as the daughters are simply returning the sons' money to them. They further state that it would be middas Sodom for the daughters not to sign, as they are not entitled to the money in any case and it would be improper not to help the sons gain access to what is rightfully theirs. Others argue that although the daughters cannot take the property for themselves, they also can't be forced to sign for free. They have a right to demand compensation for the "service" of signing the documents.
Poskim throughout the later generations debated this point. It seems that the common minhag was for daughters to be given something in exchange for their signature. Many Poskim advise the heirs to arrive at a compromise regarding how much to give them. |
No comments:
Post a Comment